GED Reasoning Through Language ArtsExtended Response (Essay)Easy
A student is analyzing two source texts for an argumentative essay. Source A argues that mandatory community service benefits high school students by fostering civic responsibility. Source B contends that mandatory community service infringes on student autonomy and can lead to resentment. Which of the following is the most effective approach for the student to develop a strong argumentative essay?
- AParaphrase key sentences from both sources to create a longer essay.
- BSummarize both sources individually without connecting their arguments.
- CIdentify common themes and conflicting points to establish a clear thesis statement.
- DChoose one source to support exclusively, ignoring the opposing viewpoint.
Show answer & explanationAnswer & explanation
Correct answer: C. Identify common themes and conflicting points to establish a clear thesis statement.
To develop a strong argumentative essay, students must synthesize information from multiple sources. Identifying common themes and conflicting points allows for the creation of a nuanced thesis statement that addresses the complexities of the topic, rather than simply summarizing or choosing one side.
Why the other options are wrong
- A. While paraphrasing is part of essay writing, it doesn't, by itself, constitute developing a strong argumentative essay without analysis and synthesis.
- B. This approach would result in a descriptive summary, not an argumentative essay.
- D. Ignoring opposing viewpoints weakens an argumentative essay by failing to acknowledge counterarguments, which is crucial for a strong thesis.
Synthesizing Sources
The process of combining information from multiple sources to form a new, comprehensive understanding or argument.
- Involves identifying connections, differences, and insights across texts.
- Goes beyond summarizing individual sources.
- Essential for developing a nuanced and well-supported argument.
Memory trick: To argue well, synthesize facts and forge a clear path.