Passage: "The debate surrounding the legal status of artificial intelligence (AI) as an 'inventor' or 'author' highlights a fundamental tension in intellectual property law. Current frameworks, primarily designed for human creativity, struggle to accommodate autonomous AI systems. For instance, patent law requires an 'inventor' to be a natural person, a stipulation rooted in the historical understanding of inventorship as a product of human ingenuity. Similarly, copyright law vests authorship in individuals, reflecting the concept of creative expression originating from a human mind. While some argue that extending IP rights to AI would incentivize innovation by encouraging the development of more sophisticated algorithms, others contend that it would dilute the traditional understanding of creativity and potentially lead to an explosion of trivial patents or copyrights generated by machines. Moreover, the economic implications of granting AI IP rights are complex, raising questions about ownership, liability, and the distribution of economic benefits from AI-generated works. Resolving this issue will likely require significant legislative re-evaluation or novel legal interpretations." Which of the following scenarios is LEAST analogous to the tension described in the passage regarding AI and intellectual property?

1. AThe historical struggle to define 'software' as patentable subject matter, given its abstract nature compared to traditional inventions.
2. BThe controversy surrounding whether a musical composition created by a human composer based on a traditional folk melody is original enough to qualify for copyright protection.
3. CThe debate over whether a chimpanzee using a camera to take a selfie can be considered the 'author' of the photograph under copyright law.
4. DThe legal challenge of applying existing privacy laws, designed for individual human data, to large datasets generated by IoT devices.