Passage: "The traditional view of legal precedent, or stare decisis, holds that courts should generally adhere to prior rulings to ensure stability and predictability. However, critical legal scholars argue that this adherence often masks underlying political and social biases, perpetuating injustices under the guise of neutrality. They contend that judges, far from being neutral arbiters, are influenced by their own perspectives and the dominant ideologies of their time. Therefore, what appears to be a consistent application of law is, in reality, a selective interpretation that favors certain outcomes. While proponents of stare decisis emphasize its role in maintaining a stable legal order, critics highlight its potential to entrench existing power structures and resist necessary social change." In the context of the passage, the phrase 'perpetuating injustices under the guise of neutrality' suggests that critical legal scholars believe:

1. AJudges consciously seek to create unjust outcomes through their rulings.
2. BThe appearance of judicial impartiality can conceal the continuation of unfair outcomes.
3. CAll legal systems are fundamentally designed to be unjust and biased.
4. DLegal precedent is inherently neutral but can be misapplied by biased judges.