Passage: The concept of 'moral relativism' asserts that moral judgments are true or false only relative to some particular standpoint, such as a cultural or individual perspective, and that no single standpoint is uniquely privileged over others. For example, if a culture believes that eating meat is morally wrong, then for members of that culture, eating meat is morally wrong, and there is no objective, universal moral truth that overrides this cultural belief. This contrasts with moral absolutism, which holds that there are universal moral principles that apply to everyone, everywhere. Consider a society where it is considered morally acceptable for individuals to harvest organs from deceased family members without explicit prior consent, provided the family agrees. A visitor from another society, where explicit consent is always required, argues that this practice is inherently immoral. From the perspective of moral relativism, which of the following is the most accurate statement regarding this situation?

1. AThe visitor's judgment is objectively correct, as explicit consent is a universal moral requirement.
2. BThe harvesting practice is objectively immoral, regardless of cultural beliefs.
3. CThe visitor should impose their society's moral standards on the host society.
4. DBoth societies' practices are equally morally valid within their respective cultural contexts.