LSAT (Law School Admission Test)Logical ReasoningMedium

Political Analyst: The recent electoral results, which saw a significant increase in voter turnout among young adults, demonstrate a growing disillusionment with traditional political parties. This is evident because a substantial portion of these new young voters cast their ballots for independent candidates, rather than for candidates from the two major parties.

  1. AMany young adults who previously voted for major parties switched their allegiance to independent candidates.
  2. BThe increase in young adult voter turnout was primarily driven by a highly publicized local issue that independent candidates strongly championed.
  3. CThe overall number of votes for major parties decreased in this election compared to previous ones.
  4. DYoung adults who are highly engaged in social media are more likely to vote for independent candidates.
Show answer & explanation

Correct answer: B. The increase in young adult voter turnout was primarily driven by a highly publicized local issue that independent candidates strongly championed.

The analyst concludes that increased turnout and votes for independents show 'growing disillusionment with traditional political parties.' Option D provides an alternative explanation for the observed voting pattern: young adults voted for independents not out of disillusionment with major parties, but because independents championed a specific issue that motivated these new voters, thus weakening the analyst's conclusion about disillusionment.

Why the other options are wrong

  • A. This would support the analyst's conclusion, indicating a shift away from major parties.
  • C. This would also support the analyst's conclusion by showing a decline in major party support.
  • D. This describes a characteristic of young voters but doesn't explain *why* they are voting for independents in a way that weakens the 'disillusionment' claim.

Alternative Explanation

An alternative explanation is a different reason or cause for an observed phenomenon that challenges the one proposed in an argument, often weakening the original conclusion.

  • It provides a plausible reason other than the one given.
  • It often directly competes with the original conclusion's validity.
  • It is a common way to weaken causal arguments.

Memory trick: When there's another path, the first one might not be the only truth.

More Logical Reasoning questions