LSAT (Law School Admission Test)Logical ReasoningMedium

Biologist: 'The recent increase in the population of a certain invasive beetle species is a direct result of the abnormally warm winters we have experienced over the past five years. These warmer temperatures allowed more beetles to survive through the winter months.'

  1. AThe beetle species is also known to reproduce more rapidly in warmer conditions.
  2. BThe region has seen a significant decrease in the population of the beetle's natural predators.
  3. COther invasive species in the region have not shown similar population increases.
  4. DThe biologist's research was funded by an organization advocating for climate change awareness.
Show answer & explanation

Correct answer: B. The region has seen a significant decrease in the population of the beetle's natural predators.

The biologist attributes the beetle population increase solely to warmer winters. Option B introduces an alternative cause—a decrease in natural predators—that could also directly explain the population increase, thereby weakening the biologist's conclusion that warmer winters are the *direct* cause.

Why the other options are wrong

  • A. This would *strengthen* the biologist's argument by providing another mechanism by which warmer temperatures contribute to population increase.
  • C. This might suggest the warming isn't universally impactful, but doesn't offer an alternative cause for *this* beetle's increase.
  • D. This is an ad hominem attack on the biologist's motivation, which does not address the logical validity of the argument itself.

Alternative Cause (Causal Argument)

A flaw in reasoning where an argument fails to consider other plausible factors that could have caused an observed effect, attributing it solely to one specific cause.

  • Weakens a causal claim by introducing competing explanations.
  • Does not necessarily disprove the original cause, but reduces its certainty.
  • Often seen when correlation is presented as causation.

Memory trick: Don't just point to one, there could be another one!

More Logical Reasoning questions