GRE General TestAnalytical WritingEasy
A university is considering implementing a new policy requiring all undergraduate students to complete a mandatory 'global citizenship' course. Proponents argue this will broaden students' perspectives and prepare them for an interconnected world. Opponents claim that this will add an unnecessary burden to students' already demanding schedules and that such a course cannot effectively convey the complexities of global citizenship. Which of the following, if true, would most weaken the opponents' claim that the course cannot effectively convey the complexities of global citizenship?
- AIndependent studies show that universities offering similar courses consistently report high student engagement and positive learning outcomes related to global awareness.
- BThe proposed course would replace an existing elective, not add to the total credit requirement.
- CMany students already struggle to complete their current course loads within four years.
- DFaculty members across various departments express concerns about the specific curriculum proposed for the global citizenship course.
Show answer & explanationAnswer & explanation
Correct answer: A. Independent studies show that universities offering similar courses consistently report high student engagement and positive learning outcomes related to global awareness.
The opponents argue the course cannot effectively convey complexities. If similar courses at other universities *do* achieve positive learning outcomes related to global awareness, it directly refutes the claim that such a course cannot be effective.
Why the other options are wrong
- B. This weakens the opponents' claim about burden, not their claim about the course's effectiveness.
- C. This strengthens the opponents' claim about burdening students, not their claim about the course's effectiveness.
- D. Faculty concerns about a *specific* curriculum don't mean that *any* global citizenship course is ineffective; it only points to potential flaws in this particular proposal.
Weakening a Specific Counter-Claim
To weaken a specific claim within a counter-argument, provide evidence that directly contradicts or undermines that particular aspect of the opposing viewpoint.
- Pinpoint the exact claim to be weakened.
- Look for data or examples that refute that specific claim.
- Ignore information that addresses other parts of the counter-argument or main argument.
Memory trick: Targeting the weak link in the opposition's chain.