Multistate Professional Responsibility Examination (MPRE)Litigation and Other Forms of AdvocacyHard

A lawyer is representing a client in a contentious administrative hearing. During a break, the lawyer overhears the administrative law judge (ALJ) discussing the case with opposing counsel, clearly indicating a predisposition against the lawyer's client based on information not presented in the hearing. The lawyer believes this constitutes a violation of the ALJ's impartiality. What is the lawyer's most appropriate immediate action?

  1. AFile a motion for disqualification of the ALJ based on the observed bias.
  2. BInform the client about the overheard conversation and continue with the hearing.
  3. CReport the ALJ to the judicial ethics committee after the hearing concludes.
  4. DConfront the ALJ and opposing counsel immediately about the improper discussion.
Show answer & explanation

Correct answer: A. File a motion for disqualification of the ALJ based on the observed bias.

If a lawyer observes conduct by a judicial officer that clearly indicates a lack of impartiality or improper ex parte communication, the most appropriate immediate action is to file a motion for disqualification. This directly addresses the impartiality issue and seeks to protect the client's right to a fair hearing, based on the evidence presented in the hearing.

Why the other options are wrong

  • B. Simply informing the client and continuing would fail to address the fundamental unfairness of a biased tribunal.
  • C. Reporting to an ethics committee is a long-term measure and does not immediately remedy the impartiality issue impacting the current hearing.
  • D. Confrontation might be unprofessional and could disrupt the hearing without formally addressing the issue.

Impartiality of Tribunal

Lawyers have a duty to protect the impartiality of the tribunal and must take appropriate action if they observe judicial misconduct or bias.

  • Prohibits ex parte communications with judicial officers.
  • Lawyers must not seek to influence judges by improper means.
  • Must address observed judicial bias or misconduct through appropriate legal channels.

Memory trick: Bias in court? Disqualify, don't just pout!

More Litigation and Other Forms of Advocacy questions