Multistate Professional Responsibility Examination (MPRE)Litigation and Other Forms of AdvocacyMedium

A lawyer represents a client in a civil case where a critical piece of evidence is a document that the lawyer reasonably believes is genuine but cannot definitively prove its authenticity without the testimony of a third-party witness who is unavailable. The opposing counsel challenges the document's authenticity. What is the lawyer's ethical obligation regarding the document?

  1. AThe lawyer must inform the court ex parte about the authentication issue.
  2. BThe lawyer must withdraw the document, as its authenticity cannot be definitively proven.
  3. CThe lawyer may offer the document into evidence, explaining the efforts made to authenticate it and the unavailability of the witness.
  4. DThe lawyer may offer the document and argue for its authenticity without disclosing the witness's unavailability.
Show answer & explanation

Correct answer: C. The lawyer may offer the document into evidence, explaining the efforts made to authenticate it and the unavailability of the witness.

A lawyer may offer evidence that they reasonably believe is relevant and admissible, even if its authenticity is challenged, provided they have a good faith basis for offering it. The lawyer should disclose any known limitations or challenges to the evidence, such as the unavailability of a key authentication witness, to the court and opposing counsel, allowing the tribunal to determine its admissibility and weight.

Why the other options are wrong

  • A. Ex parte communication with the court about evidentiary issues is generally improper and violates fairness to opposing counsel.
  • B. Withdrawal is unnecessary if the lawyer has a reasonable belief in authenticity and can present arguments for admissibility.
  • D. Failing to disclose the unavailability of a key authentication witness, while arguing for authenticity, could be seen as a lack of candor, especially if it misleads the tribunal.

Candor Regarding Evidence

A lawyer shall not knowingly offer evidence that the lawyer knows to be false. If a lawyer has reason to believe evidence is false, they must take reasonable remedial measures.

  • Do not offer evidence known to be false.
  • If reasonable belief of falsity, may refuse to offer.
  • Duty to disclose adverse legal authority.

Memory trick: Offer with belief, disclose the doubt, let the court sort it out.

More Litigation and Other Forms of Advocacy questions