California First-Year Law Students' Exam (Baby Bar) — MCContractsMedium

A small business owner enters into a contract with a marketing firm for a six-month advertising campaign, costing $5,000 per month. The contract includes a clause stating, 'Either party may terminate this Agreement upon thirty (30) days' written notice to the other party.' After three months, the business owner decides to terminate the contract and provides the marketing firm with thirty days' written notice. The marketing firm argues that this termination clause is an illusory promise and therefore the entire contract lacks consideration. Is the marketing firm correct?

  1. ANo, because the thirty-day notice requirement provides a real, although limited, commitment.
  2. BNo, because the business owner has already paid for three months of service.
  3. CYes, because the marketing firm is still obligated to perform for the notice period.
  4. DYes, because the business owner can terminate at will, making their promise illusory.
Show answer & explanation

Correct answer: A. No, because the thirty-day notice requirement provides a real, although limited, commitment.

A promise is not illusory if the promisor's right to terminate is subject to a condition, such as prior notice. The requirement to give 30 days' notice means the business owner is still bound for that period and cannot simply walk away without consequence, thus providing sufficient consideration.

Why the other options are wrong

  • B. Past payment doesn't retroactively fix an illusory promise for future performance; the focus is on the promise itself.
  • C. The marketing firm's obligation during the notice period doesn't make the *business owner's* promise non-illusory if there's no commitment from the owner.
  • D. The 'at will' argument is incorrect because the notice period imposes a limitation on the right to terminate.

Illusory Promise

A promise that appears to be a promise but in fact does not bind the promisor to any performance, usually due to an unlimited right to withdraw or cancel without notice or penalty.

  • Lack of true commitment renders the promise illusory.
  • An illusory promise cannot serve as consideration.
  • Limitations on the right to terminate (e.g., notice period) make a promise non-illusory.

Memory trick: Illusory Promises Are Just Smoke, No Real Fire of Commitment.

More Contracts questions