Multistate Professional Responsibility Examination (MPRE)Transactions and Communications with Persons Other Than ClientsMedium

Attorney Miller is representing a startup company in a contentious negotiation for a major investment. During a break, Miller makes a statement to the opposing counsel, "My client is prepared to walk away from this deal entirely if your terms don't improve by 20%." Miller knows this statement is false and that her client desperately needs the investment and would accept much less favorable terms. Has Miller violated the Model Rules of Professional Conduct?

  1. ANo, because this is a permissible puffery or negotiation tactic that does not constitute a false statement of material fact.
  2. BYes, but only if the opposing counsel relied on the statement to their detriment.
  3. CNo, because the statement was made to opposing counsel, who is expected to discern such tactics.
  4. DYes, because a lawyer must not knowingly make a false statement of material fact or law to a third person.
Show answer & explanation

Correct answer: D. Yes, because a lawyer must not knowingly make a false statement of material fact or law to a third person.

Model Rule 4.1(a) states that a lawyer shall not knowingly make a false statement of material fact or law to a third person. While certain statements during negotiation, such as estimates of price or value, or a party's intentions as to an acceptable settlement, are ordinarily not considered statements of material fact, a lawyer's statement about a client's willingness to accept certain terms or walk away, when known to be untrue and intended to mislead, can cross the line into a false statement of material fact.

Why the other options are wrong

  • A. While puffery is allowed, misrepresenting a client's actual intention or position when it's a known falsehood goes beyond mere puffery and constitutes a false statement of material fact.
  • B. The violation occurs when the false statement is knowingly made; reliance or detriment to the opposing party is not a prerequisite for a violation of Rule 4.1(a).
  • C. The recipient's sophistication does not excuse a lawyer from the ethical duty of truthfulness under Rule 4.1.

Truthfulness in Statements to Others

A lawyer shall not knowingly make a false statement of material fact or law to a third person, nor fail to disclose a material fact when disclosure is necessary to avoid assisting a criminal or fraudulent act by a client.

  • No false statements of material fact/law.
  • Puffery in negotiation is generally allowed.
  • Disclosure required to avoid assisting client crime/fraud.

Memory trick: Be 'Honest' of 'Fact', or 'Assist' no 'Fraudulent Act'.

More Transactions and Communications with Persons Other Than Clients questions