AWS Certified Developer – Associate (DVA-C02)Troubleshooting and MonitoringHard

A developer has implemented a new feature in an application that involves uploading large files directly to an S3 bucket using presigned URLs. Users are reporting that uploads intermittently fail with a '403 Forbidden' error, even though the presigned URL was generated correctly with appropriate permissions. The application code generating the presigned URL does not specify any 'Content-Type' or 'Content-MD5' during generation, but the client-side upload includes a 'Content-Type' header. Which of the following is the MOST likely cause of the 403 Forbidden errors?

  1. AThe IAM role or user generating the presigned URL lacks the 's3:PutObject' permission on the target S3 bucket.
  2. BThe S3 bucket policy is implicitly denying the upload operation due to a condition that is not being met.
  3. CThe client-side upload request includes HTTP headers that were not specified or matched when the presigned URL was generated.
  4. DThe presigned URL's expiration time is too short, causing it to expire before the large file upload completes.
Show answer & explanation

Correct answer: C. The client-side upload request includes HTTP headers that were not specified or matched when the presigned URL was generated.

When generating an S3 presigned URL, if certain HTTP headers (like `Content-Type`, `Content-Disposition`, `Content-Encoding`, `x-amz-meta-*`) are expected to be sent by the client during the upload, they *must* be included in the presigned URL generation request. If the client sends headers that were not specified during URL generation (or sends different values for specified headers), S3 will return a 403 Forbidden error because the signature calculated on the server-side won't match the actual request.

Why the other options are wrong

  • A. The question states the presigned URL was generated 'correctly with appropriate permissions', so this is less likely to be the direct cause of the 403 specific to this scenario.
  • B. While a bucket policy could deny, the scenario points to a client-side discrepancy with headers, which is a more direct cause for 403s with presigned URLs when permissions are otherwise fine.
  • D. An expired URL would typically result in a '403 Request has expired' specific error, not just a generic '403 Forbidden' related to header mismatch.

S3 Presigned URL Header Matching

When generating an S3 presigned URL for upload, any HTTP headers (e.g., Content-Type, Content-MD5, x-amz-meta-*) that the client is expected to send with the PUT request *must* be included in the presigning request. If the client sends headers that do not match those used during presigning, the upload will fail with a 403 Forbidden error due to signature mismatch.

  • Client-side headers must match presigned URL generation.
  • Common headers: Content-Type, Content-MD5, x-amz-meta-.
  • Mismatch results in 403 Forbidden error.

Memory trick: The 'Presigned' URL is a signed contract; every 'Header' must match perfectly.

More Troubleshooting and Monitoring questions