Bar Exam — MBE (Multistate Bar Exam)EvidenceEasy

During a civil trial for breach of contract, the plaintiff calls a witness to testify about a conversation she overheard between the defendant and a third party. The witness states, "The defendant told the third party, 'I can't believe I signed that contract; it's going to ruin me.'" The defendant's attorney objects, citing hearsay. How should the court rule?

  1. ASustain the objection, as the statement is not under oath.
  2. BOverrule the objection, as the statement is an excited utterance.
  3. CSustain the objection, as the statement is out-of-court and offered for its truth.
  4. DOverrule the objection, as the statement is a party-opponent admission.
Show answer & explanation

Correct answer: D. Overrule the objection, as the statement is a party-opponent admission.

The statement made by the defendant is a party-opponent admission. Such admissions are not considered hearsay under the Federal Rules of Evidence and are therefore admissible.

Why the other options are wrong

  • A. Lack of oath is a characteristic of many out-of-court statements, but certain exceptions and exclusions, like party-opponent admissions, allow their admission.
  • B. An excited utterance requires a startling event and a statement made while under the stress of excitement, which is not clearly indicated here.
  • C. While the statement is out-of-court, it falls under an exception to hearsay, making it admissible.

Party-Opponent Admission

A statement offered against an opposing party that was made by the party in an individual or representative capacity, or by a person whom the party authorized to make a statement concerning the subject, or by the party's agent or employee on a matter within the scope of that relationship and while it existed, or by a coconspirator during and in furtherance of the conspiracy.

  • Not considered hearsay under FRE 801(d)(2).
  • Can be used as substantive evidence.
  • Does not require personal knowledge by the declarant.

Memory trick: Hearsay: Hear Say? No Way! Unless it's a 'D.E.A.D. P.A.R.T.Y.' admission!

More Evidence questions