ACT (Enhanced)ReadingMedium
A historical document from the 17th century describes a new colonial settlement: "The land, though fertile and abundant in timber, was also home to various 'savage tribes' who frequently 'molested' our surveyors and 'hindered' our righteous expansion. Despite these challenges, our resolve, guided by divine providence, remains unwavering in establishing a foothold for civilization in this wilderness." Based on the author's language, what can be inferred about the prevailing attitude towards the indigenous population?
- AThere was a desire to understand and integrate their customs.
- BThe author saw them as a significant obstacle to colonial expansion.
- CThey were viewed as potential allies for trade and cooperation.
- DThe indigenous people were considered passive observers of the settlement.
Show answer & explanationAnswer & explanation
Correct answer: B. The author saw them as a significant obstacle to colonial expansion.
Words like 'savage tribes,' 'molested,' and 'hindered' strongly suggest a negative perception of the indigenous population as an impediment to the settlers' goals. The phrase 'righteous expansion' further implies that any resistance was seen as illegitimate.
Why the other options are wrong
- A. There is no indication of desire for understanding or integration; instead, the language is dismissive and hostile.
- C. The terms used ('savage tribes,' 'molested,' 'hindered') contradict any notion of seeking alliance or cooperation.
- D. The words 'molested' and 'hindered' directly contradict the idea of passive observation, indicating active resistance or interference.
Inference from Word Choice
Drawing a conclusion about an author's unstated meaning, tone, or perspective based on the specific words and phrases they use in a text.
- Requires reading between the lines.
- Relies on connotative meanings.
- Reveals author's bias or attitude.
Memory trick: Read the Words, Guess the Thoughts.