ACT (Enhanced)ReadingHard
In a philosophical essay, the author introduces a complex ethical dilemma, then presents two opposing viewpoints with equal rigor, exploring the strengths and weaknesses of each without explicitly favoring one. The essay concludes by suggesting that the reader must weigh the evidence and make their own informed decision. What is the author's primary rhetorical strategy in this essay?
- ATo present a balanced exploration of an issue, inviting reader deliberation.
- BTo simplify complex issues for a general audience.
- CTo expose the inherent flaws in both opposing arguments.
- DTo advocate for a specific moral stance through subtle persuasion.
Show answer & explanationAnswer & explanation
Correct answer: A. To present a balanced exploration of an issue, inviting reader deliberation.
The author presents 'two opposing viewpoints with equal rigor,' explores 'strengths and weaknesses of each without explicitly favoring one,' and 'concludes by suggesting that the reader must weigh the evidence.' This cumulative description points to a strategy of balanced exploration and encouraging reader deliberation.
Why the other options are wrong
- B. The essay deals with a 'complex ethical dilemma' and explores it with 'equal rigor,' suggesting depth rather than simplification.
- C. While weaknesses are explored, the text also mentions strengths and doesn't solely focus on 'inherent flaws' in *both* as the primary goal.
- D. The text explicitly states the author avoids 'explicitly favoring one,' which contradicts subtle persuasion for a specific stance.
Rhetorical Strategy: Balanced Presentation
A rhetorical strategy where an author presents multiple perspectives on an issue fairly and objectively, often encouraging the audience to form their own conclusions.
- Avoids explicit bias or advocacy for one side.
- Explores both strengths and weaknesses of different viewpoints.
- Aims to inform and facilitate critical thinking rather than persuade.
Memory trick: How the author tries to 'get' to you.