CRISC Certified in Risk and Information Systems ControlGovernanceHard

A financial institution is implementing a new digital banking platform that leverages artificial intelligence (AI) for fraud detection and personalized customer services. The project team is under pressure to deliver quickly. An independent risk assessment reveals that the AI model, while effective, is a 'black box' solution, meaning its decision-making process is not easily explainable or auditable. This raises concerns about regulatory compliance (e.g., fairness, transparency) and potential reputational damage. Which of the following is the MOST appropriate action for the risk manager to recommend to the project steering committee?

  1. AProceed with the current AI model, focusing on its effectiveness in fraud detection, and plan for explainability improvements in future versions.
  2. BRequire the project team to halt development and redesign the AI model to incorporate explainable AI (XAI) capabilities, even if it delays the launch.
  3. CEngage a public relations firm to preemptively manage potential negative publicity regarding the AI's lack of transparency.
  4. DImplement additional post-implementation monitoring and human review processes to validate AI decisions and detect bias.
Show answer & explanation

Correct answer: B. Require the project team to halt development and redesign the AI model to incorporate explainable AI (XAI) capabilities, even if it delays the launch.

The 'black box' nature of the AI model, combined with regulatory and reputational concerns, requires a fundamental solution. Redesigning the model for explainable AI (XAI) capabilities addresses the root cause by embedding transparency and auditability into the system's core, which is essential for ethical AI and compliance in a regulated industry. Post-implementation monitoring (B) or future improvements (A) are reactive and do not fully mitigate the inherent governance risk. PR (D) is a communication strategy, not a risk mitigation strategy.

Why the other options are wrong

  • A. Proceeding with a known 'black box' AI in a regulated industry without fundamental change is a high-risk approach, deferring critical issues.
  • C. A public relations campaign is a reactive communication strategy and does not solve the underlying technical and ethical governance problem.
  • D. Post-implementation monitoring is a control, but it doesn't address the inherent lack of transparency and auditability in the model itself, which is a core governance issue.

Explainable AI (XAI) Governance

The governance principle of ensuring AI systems are designed to be transparent, interpretable, and auditable, especially in regulated or high-impact environments, to enable accountability and trust.

  • Crucial for regulatory compliance (e.g., fairness, consumer protection).
  • Mitigates reputational and ethical risks.
  • Requires 'designing in' transparency, not adding it later.

Memory trick: When the AI box is black, demand explainability to get on the right track.

More Governance questions